|
|
CARDIOLOGY
UPDATE - Landmark Trials
LIFE
substudy
|
|
|
|
Cardiovascular
morbidity and mortality in patients with
diabetes in the Losartan
Intervention For Endpoint
Reduction in hypertension study (LIFE
substudy):
a randomized trial against atenolol
|
| |
|
Background
Diabetes mellitus doubles
the risk of cardiovascular disease, even in patients
with hypertension who are
already at high risk. Since many hypertensives develop
diabetes, the combination of risk factors will account
for a large proportion of cardiovascular morbidity and
mortality. In the LIFE substudy, the effects of losartan
and atenolol in patients with diabetes, hypertension
and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) on the frequency
of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality were compared.
Aim
To compare the long-term
effects of Losartan and Atenolol on cardiovascular morbidity
and mortality in
patients with diabetes, hypertension and LVH.
Patient
characteristics
1195 patients aged 55-80 years
with diabetes (most likely of type 2), essential hypertension,
and LVH
(ascertained by electrocardiography).
Study
groups
Losartan vs. Atenolol
If blood pressure was not controlled,
then hydrochlorothiazide was added. Groups were well
balanced for treatment with antidiabetic drugs or lipid
lowering drugs or aspirin.
Study
duration
Mean follow-up: 4.7 years
Results
|
| |
|
 |
Losartan
showed a significant 24.5% reduction in risk in cardiovascular
mortality, stroke
and myocardial infarction as compared to atenolol. |
| |
|
| |
 |
| |
|
 |
Losartan
significantly reduced cardiovascular
mortality by 36.6% as compared to atenolol. |
| |
|
| |
 |
| |
|
 |
A 38.7%
reduction in relative risk for total mortality was
seen with losartan as compared to atenolol. |
| |
|
| |
 |
| |
|
 |
A significant
41% reduction in hospital admissions for heart failure
was seen with losartan as
compared to atenolol. |
| |
|
 |
Losartan
was more effective than
atenolol in reversing LVH. |
| |
|
| |
 |
| |
|
 |
Greater
percentage of patients achieved target
BP in the losartan group. |
| |
|
| |
 |
| |
|
 |
Fewer
discontinuations were seen with
losartan than with atenolol. |
| |
|
| |
 |
| |
|
 |
Albuminuria
was reported significantly less frequently with losartan
(7%) than with atenolol (13%). |
| |
| Conclusion |
| |
|
 |
Losartan
was more effective than atenolol in reducing the risk
of
cardiovascular morbidity and mortality as well as mortality
from all causes
in patients with diabetes, hypertension and LVH. |
| |
|
 |
Losartan
seems to have benefits beyond blood pressure reduction.
|
| |
|
 |
The greater
cardiovascular protective effect of losartan than atenolol
could
result from more pronounced blockade of the detrimental
effects of
angiotensin II. |
| |
|
| Ref:
Lancet 2002; 359:1004-1010 |
|
|