|
Title
a. Randomized trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444
patients with coronary heart disease: The Scandinavian
Simvastatin Survival Study (4S)
b. Baseline serum cholesterol and treatment effect in
the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S).
c. Reducing the risk of coronary events: evidence from
the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S).
d. Cholesterol lowering therapy in women and elderly
patients with myocardial infarction or angina pectoris.
Findings from the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival
Trial (4S).
e. Cost effectiveness of simvastatin treatment to lower
cholesterol levels in patients with coronary heart disease.
f. Lipoprotein changes and reduction in the incidence
of major coronary heart disease events in the Scandinavian
Simvastatin Survival Study (4S).
g. Effect of simvastatin on ischemic signs and symptoms
in the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S)
Purpose
To assess the effect of simvastatin therapy
on mortality and morbidity of patients with coronary
artery disease and
serum cholesterol 5.5-8.0 mmol/L.
To determine the cost effectiveness of lowering
cholesterol in relationship to age, sex, and the cholesterol
level from the
4S study.
To determine which baseline lipoproteins are
predictive of coronary events.
To determine which changes in lipoproteins accounted
for the reduction in coronary events in the 4S.
To determine effect of lipid intervention with
simvastatin on noncoronary ischemic symptoms and signs
over 5.4 years
Design
Randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, multicenter.
Patients
4444 patients, aged 35-70 years, with a history of
angina pectoris or myocardial infarction, and serum
cholesterol 5.5-8.0 mmol/L, (213-309 mg per deciliter)
and serum triglyceride £ 2.5 mmol/L were included.
Premenopausal women, patients with secondary hypercholesterolemia,
patients with myocardial infarction within 6 months,
congestive heart failure, planned coronary artery surgery,
or angioplasty were excluded.
Follow-up
Clinical follow-up for 4.9-6.3 years (median 5.4 years)
Treatment regimen
Simvastatin 20 mg/d or placebo. If serum cholesterol
did not reach the target range of 3.0-5.2 mmol/L by
simvastatin 20 mg/d, the dose was increased to 40 mg/d.
If necessary, dose was decreased to 10 mg/d.
Additional therapy
Dietary advice
Results
Lipid concentrations changed only little in
the placebo group, whereas simvastatin resulted in -
25%, -35%, +8%, and
-10% change from baseline of total, LDL, and HDL cholesterol,
and triglycerides.
After 1 year, 72% of the simvastatin group had
achieved total cholesterol < 5.2 mmol/L.
During the follow-up, mortality was 12% in the
placebo and 8% in the simvastatin group (RR 0.70, p=0.0003).
Coronary mortality was 8.5% vs 5.0%, respectively
(RR 0.58).
28% of the placebo and 19% of the simvastatin
group had 1 or more major coronary events (coronary
death, myocardial
infarction, or resuscitated cardiac arrest (RR 0.66,
p<0.00001).
The relative risk of having any coronary event
in the simvastatin group was 0.73 (p < 0.00001).
Simvastatin also reduced the risk of undergoing
coronary artery bypass surgery or angioplasty (RR 0.63,
p < 0.00001).
The overall rates of adverse effects were not different
between the groups.
Simvastatin significantly reduced the risk of
major coronary events in all quartiles of baseline total,
HDL, and LDL cholesterol, by a similar amount in each
quartile.
A recent post hoc analysis showed that patients
³ 65 years of age who received simvastatin had
a reduced relative risk (RR) for clinical events. The
RRs (95% confidence intervals) were 0.66 (0.40-0.90)
for all cause mortality; 0.57
(0.39-0.83) for coronary heart disease mortality; and
0.66 (0.52-0.84) for major coronary events. The RR was
also reduced for any atherosclerotic related events
and revascularization procedures. In women the RRs were
1.16 (0.68- 1.99), 0.86 (0.42-1.74), and 066 (0.48-0.91)
for all cause mortality, coronary heart disease mortality,
and major coronary events. Any atherosclerotic related
event and revascularization procedures also were reduced
in women on
simvastatin.
The cost of each year of life gained ranged from
$ 3,800 for 70 year old men with cholesterol levels
of 309 mg/dL to $ 27,400 for 35 year old women with
213 mg/dL. With indirect costs included, the costs ranged
from youngest patients exhibiting a savings in money
while 70 year old women with 213 cholesterol levels
cost $ 13,300 per year of life gained.
Simvastatin reduced cholesterol by 25% and LDL
cholesterol by 34%. Three fourths of patients on simvastatin
had reduction of LDL cholesterol by 30%; a quarter had
reduction by > 45%. Reduction in coronary events
on simvastatin correlated with on-treatment levels and
changes in total, LDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein
B. There
was less of a correlation with triglyceride levels.
Each 1% reduction in LDL cholesterol reduced coronary
risk by 1.7%. There was no evidence for any % reduction
or on-treatment threshold below which further reduction
of LDL cholesterol did not have benefit.
Risk of claudication, bruits, and angina were
decreased by simvastatin. The risk of new or worsening
carotid bruits was significantly decreased. Fatal plus
nonfatal cerebral events (stroke or transient ischemic
attacks) was reduced by 28% with simvastatin. New or
worsening intermittent claudication was decreased by
38% with the statin; new or worsening angina was decreased
by 26%.
Conclusion
Long term therapy with simvastatin is safe and
effective in improvement of survival and reduction of
the rate of
coronary events.
Simvastatin produced similar reductions in relative
risk for major coronary events in women vs men and in
elderly vs
younger patients.
In patients with coronary artery disease, simvastatin
is cost effective.
The beneficial effect of simvastatin on major
coronary events was dependent upon the magnitude of
reduction in LDL
cholesterol, without a threshold below which reduction
was no longer beneficial.
Cholesterol lowering with simvastatin 20-40 mg/day
retards progression of atherosclerosis throughout the
vascular
system.
|