|
|
In this issue...
- Lack
of adverse clinical interaction between Clopidogrel
and Atorvastatin
- Beta
Blockers Are Clinically Beneficial Before Angioplasty
For Myocardial Infarction
- Blood
Test For Detection of Ischemia Modified Albumin Can
Help Rule Out Cardiac Cause of Chest Pain
- Losartan
Reduces Urinary Albumin Excretion in Normotensive
Type 2 Diabetics
- Sibutramine is an effective
adjunct in obese type 2 diabetic patients on metformin
- Ramipril Reduces Advanced Glycation
End Products In Non-Diabetic Nephropathy
|
| |
Lack of adverse clinical
interaction between Clopidogrel and Atorvastatin
|
Clopidogrel
and statin co administration has no adverse effect
on death, myocardial infarction (MI) and/or stroke,
according to data from the Clopidogrel for the Reduction
of Events During Observation (CREDO) trial.
This study, published in August 26, 2003 issue of
Circulation is the first one to evaluate the
clinical impact of concomitant clopidogrel and statin
use.
Researchers Dr. Saw J, Dr. Steinhubl
and colleagues said, "In this post hoc analysis,
no statistical difference in clinical events was identified
when clopidogrel was coadministered with a statin
that was predominantly CYP3A4-metabolized or not."
In CREDO trial, pretreatment (300
mg) and 1-year (75 mg/d) clopidogrel therapy, (clopidogrel
group) was compared with no pretreatment and 1-month
clopidogrel therapy (75 mg/d) (control group) after
a percutaneous coronary intervention. Statin administration
was non-randomized and directed by the treating physicians.
A post hoc analysis was performed to evaluate the
clinical efficacy of concomitant clopidogrel and statin
administration, categorizing baseline statin use to
those predominantly CYP3A4-metabolized (atorvastatin,
lovastatin, simvastatin and cerivastatin) (CYP3A4-MET)
or others (pravastatin and fluvastatin) (non-CYP3A4-MET).
Of the 1172 patients receiving statins, 1001 received
a CYP3A4-MET statin (564 atorvastatin) and 158 a non
CYP3A4-MET statin (142 pravastatin).
The primary composite endpoint of
death, myocardial infarction and stroke was significantly
reduced by 26.9% in clopidogrel group (8.5% versus
11.5%). Benefit with clopidogrel was similar with
statin use; irrespective of treatment with a CYP3A4-MET
or non-CYP3A4-MET statin (Figure 1). Patients
given atorvastatin or pravastatin had similar 1-year
event rates. Additionally, concomitant therapy
with statins had no impact on major or minor bleeding
rates.
The study concluded that although
ex-vivo testing has suggested a potential negative
interaction when co administering a CYP3A4- metabolized
statin with clopidogrel, this was not clinically observed
statistically in a post hoc analysis of the placebo-controlled
CREDO study. Hence there is no clear evidence that
clinicians should choose statins on the basis of CYP3A4
metabolism when clopidogrel co-administration is required.
|
|
|
|
|
Beta Blockers Are Clinically
Beneficial Before Angioplasty For Myocardial Infarction
|
Beta-blocker use before primary angioplasty for acute
myocardial infarction appears to have an independent
beneficial effect on short-term outcomes, as published
in the March 15, 2003 issue of American Journal
of Cardiology.
This investigation was conducted
by Dr K J Harjai and colleagues at the William Beaumont
Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan, United States. The
researchers pooled clinical, angiographic, and outcomes
data among 2,537 patients enrolled in the Primary
Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI), PAMI-2,
and Stent PAMI trials. One cohort of 1,132 patients
received beta-blocker therapy before primary angioplasty,
and a second cohort of 1,405 patients were not given
beta-blockers.
The researchers evaluated any complications,
which arose from the angioplasty procedure, as well
as events while the patients were in hospital and
at one-year follow-up. The outcomes between the two
groups were measured for mortality, and major cardiac
events (re-infarction, target vessel revascularization,
or stroke).
It was found that patients in the
beta-blocker group were younger, had higher systolic
blood pressure and heart rate, and were more likely
to be in Killip class I at admission, than among patients
in the non-beta-blocker group. In addition, they had
lower left ventricular ejection fraction, greater
door-to-balloon time, and greater likelihood of having
a left anterior descending artery culprit lesion.
However, there was a similar incidence of TIMI-3 (Thrombolysis
In Myocardial Infarction-3) flow after angioplasty
at 92.6% among the beta-blocker group compared with
92.7% among the non-beta blocker group.
The beta-blocker group had less
procedural complications like bradyarrhythmias, ventricular
arrhythmias and intra-aortic balloon pump use (23%)
compared with the non-beta blocker group (34%). The
beta-blocker group also had a lower incidence of death
(1.8% vs. 3.7%) and major adverse cardiac events (5.5%
vs. 7.8%) during their stay in hospital. At one year,
mortality remained lower in the beta-blocker group
(4.9%) compared with the non-beta blocker group (6.7%)
After adjustment for baseline differences, Dr Harjai
and colleagues found that the beta-blocker recipients
had significantly lower mortality while in hospital,
with an odds ratio of 0.41. They also had a lower
rate of mortality at one year (odds ratio of 0.72).
|
|
|
|
|
Blood Test For Detection
of Ischemia Modified Albumin Can Help Rule Out Cardiac
Cause of Chest Pain
|
The US Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) gave clearance to market the Albumin Cobalt
Binding (ACB) test for detection of Ischemia Modified
Albumin (IMA) in February 2003. IMA is a serum
biomarker that can be used as an aid to the early
evaluation of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) prior
to heart attack in patients presenting with chest
pain suggestive of cardiac origin. The ACB test uses
a small amount of blood drawn from a patient, which
is then run on a chemistry instrument commonly available
in hospital laboratories.
IMA was first identified by an emergency physician
seeking a rapid, reliable blood test for ischemia.
Differences in blood samples between apparently healthy
volunteers and ischemic patients were found to be
due to changes in albumin, the most common protein
in blood. IMA is produced when albumin circulating
in blood comes in contact with ischemic tissue in
the heart or other organ. During ischemia, a series
of chemical reactions occur that modify albumin, resulting
in Ischemia Modified Albumin. IMA is produced continually
during ischemia, which means IMA levels in blood change
quickly. Patients at low risk for ACS have proportionately
less IMA than patients at high risk or with confirmed
ACS.
Only about one in five patients with chest pain are
ultimately diagnosed with ACS. The challenge therefore
is to determine which patients have ACS, and which
can be safely discharged home. Currently available
tests such as electrocardiography (ECG) and other
biomarkers such as troponin are limited in their impact
on making "rule-out" decisions. This decision
process often takes from 8 to 24 hours. About
75 percent of patients are in a "grey zone",
in which the emergency physician must weigh the trade-offs
of accelerating treatment versus "watchful waiting"
and additional diagnostic testing. In this case, IMA
may assist emergency physicians to "rule out"
ACS in low risk patients. With IMA, up to 40 percent
of chest pain patients could be safely discharged
within a few hours.
"The availability of a new, highly sensitive,
serum marker for myocardial ischemia will have significant
impact on clinical practice in the emergency department,"
stated Charles Pollack, MD, chairman of the emergency
department at Pennsylvania Hospital and associate
professor at the University of Pennsylvania, and a
clinical investigator of IMA.
"For several years, the clinical community has
been looking for a reliable, inexpensive test to determine
which chest pain patients can be sent home safely,"
explained Robert Jesse, MD, PhD, associate professor
of cardiology at the Medical College of Virginia,
which was one of twenty research sites involved in
clinical studies of IMA. "Studies
showed that IMA, when used in conjunction with ECG
and troponin, correctly identified low-risk patients
who could be discharged safely using test results
from patient presentation, without the need for more
extensive testing in the ED."
The emergency physician currently has three diagnostic
tools available at the time a patient presents to
help assess the likelihood of ACS: 1) ECG; 2) biomarkers
of cardiac necrosis (troponin, CKMB, myoglobin), and
3) history and physical examination. Using
these tools at patient presentation, the emergency
physician can typically diagnose 12 percent of patients
based on diagnostic ECG or elevated markers of necrosis.
Another 13 percent can be considered for discharge
based on history and physical findings. IMA adds a
fourth diagnostic tool, which helps to confirm the
chances of ACS in low risk patients.
|
|
|
| |
Losartan Reduces Urinary
Albumin Excretion in Normotensive Type 2 Diabetics
|
Losartan reduces urinary albumin excretion in normotensive
type 2 diabetics, according to the results of a randomized
trial published in the July 15, 2003 issue of the
Annals of Internal Medicine. This is the first
study of an angiotensin-receptor antagonist in normotensive
patients.
"Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors
reduce albumin excretion in both normotensive and
hypertensive patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes,"
express Adrienne A. M. Zandbergen, MD, from Ikazia
Hospital in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, and colleagues.
"Because reduction in microalbuminuria is associated
with marked renal protection, the delay or retardation
of the disease process is important in the management
of diabetes mellitus."
In this multicentre, double-blind trial, 147 patients
with type 2 diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria
were randomized to receive losartan 50 mg daily for
five weeks followed by 100 mg daily for five weeks,
or 10 weeks of placebo.
The losartan group had a significant 25% reduction
in albumin excretion rate after five weeks on 50 mg
daily, with a further reduction (34%) over the next
five weeks on 100 mg daily (Figure 1). In contrast,
in patients receiving placebo, there was a slight
reduction in albumin excretion rate at 5 weeks whereas
at the end of ten weeks there was an increase in albumin
excretion rate by 10.3%. Blood pressure decreased
slightly, and adverse effects were similar to those
in the placebo group. Multivariate analysis revealed
that the antiproteinuric effect of losartan was independent
of blood pressure reduction. When losartan was discontinued,
albumin excretion rate returned to pretreatment baseline
levels.
The authors concluded
that losartan reduces urinary albumin excretion in
normotensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
and microalbuminuria.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Sibutramine is an effective
adjunct in obese type 2 diabetic patients on metformin
|
Sibutramine is a potentially valuable adjunct to metformin
treatment in appropriately selected obese type 2 diabetic
patients and it improves metabolic control in individuals
who lose >5% weight, as reported in the January
2003 issue of Diabetes Care.
"Management of type 2 diabetes often fails to
meet the stringent treatment targets for glycemia,
lipids, blood pressure, and other cardiovascular risk
factors. The importance of obesity as a determinant
of cardiovascular outcome has generally been neglected,
despite accumulating evidence that it plays a crucial
role," noted the researchers.
This 12-month study was conducted at 21 primary and
secondary care centers in England, France, Canada
and Belgium by the Multicentre Sibutramine Study Group
investigators, Dr. McNulty SJ and his colleagues.
It involved 195 patients with type 2 diabetes and
a body mass index (BMI) >27 kg/m2. All the patients
were on metformin treatment and further randomized
to sibutramine 15 mg/day or sibutramine 20 mg/day
or placebo. Patients with ischemic heart disease,
heart failure or stroke were excluded. Metformin dosage
was adjusted if necessary, but other antidiabetic
drugs were not used.
The results revealed that at the end of one year,
sibutramine induced significant weight loss with both
15 mg/day (5.5 0.6 kg) and 20 mg/day (8.0 0.9 kg),
whereas placebo did not (0.2 0.5 kg). Weight loss
> 10% was achieved by 14 and 27% of subjects receiving
15 and 20 mg, respectively, but by none given placebo
(Figure 1). Glycemic control
improved in parallel with weight loss, and subjects
who lost >10%
weight showed significant decreases in both HbA1C
(1.2 0.4%, P<0.0001) and fasting plasma glucose
(1.8 mmol/l, P<0.001). HDL cholesterol increased
slightly with the higher dose, whereas plasma triglycerides
fell with both doses, especially in subjects with
weight loss of > 10% (a 29% decrease, P<0.01).
Weight loss of > 10% confers important metabolic
and cardiovascular benefits in obese type 2 diabetic
patients. The researchers concluded that "sibutramine
can be an effective adjunct to metformin treatment
in selected obese type 2 diabetic subjects and improves
metabolic control in individuals who lose weight."
|
|
|
| |
Ramipril
Reduces Advanced Glycation End Products In Non-Diabetic
Nephropathy
|
Ramipril produces a mild reduction in levels of advanced
glycation end products, perhaps reflecting decreased
oxidative stress, in patients with mild-to-moderate
non-diabetic nephropathy as reported in the April 2003
issue of Journal of Human Hypertension.
Researchers from the Institute of Preventive and
Clinical Medicine and the Military Hospital, Bratislava,
Slovakia, as well as the University Wuerzburg, Germany,
enrolled 12 patients with newly diagnosed mild-to-moderate
non-diabetic nephropathy, who received ramipril (2.5-5
mg) for two months and data was compared with a group
of non-diabetic nephropathy patients taking diuretics
and beta-blockers and with age- and sex-matched healthy
controls.
In this study, as compared to controls, patients
with non-diabetic nephropathy showed higher levels
of advanced glycation end products, carboxymethyllysine,
advanced oxidation protein products, lipofuscin and
homocysteine as well as mild-to-moderate renal insufficiency.
Ramipril reduced blood pressure and proteinuria,
while creatinine clearance did not alter. Ramipril
also mildly decreased levels of advanced glycation
end products (AGE), while concentrations of advanced
oxidation protein products (AOPP) and malondialdehyde
declined.
This offers the first evidence that ramipril reduces
levels of advanced glycation end products. The decline
in advanced oxidation protein products and malondialdehyde
suggests a reduction in oxidative stress. Conventional
treatment with diuretics and beta-blockers did not
significantly alter these parameters.
|
| |
|
|
|